As many of you know, I have been knee deep in researching the JFK assassination for a few months now. In doing so it has opened up quite a few rabbit holes as it relates to the Deep State and their operations around the world. Of the 150+ hours of audiobooks and additional research via a multitude of archives, it became evident that the crux of all of this was carefully being steered with a pre-determined outcome. Case-in-point, Allen Dulles sitting on the Warren Commission "guiding" them through all of the evidence and steering the committee to the desired outcome. In fact, there is very little that can be said differently from all of the books and docuseries that have been approved and pushed out by the perspective agencies. Anything that countered those accounts such as classified documents which have the potential to highlight their involvement have either been scrubbed or remain classified. So we will take a different approach over a series of blogs from the angle of "motive" as we ask the hard questions that everyone seems to gloss over.
Today, we will begin with the alleged shooter Lee Harvey Oswald and why I think he was as he put it, "a patsy". We have been told that Oswald was a marksman in the USMC and we have verified his scorecard in which he scored above 45 from 100 yards to 500 yards (300 yards was missing).
Now, before we look further at the marksman qualification I must tell you that Mrs. Monkey was also a marksman in her USAF days, and although she is proficient, she certainly isn't a crack-shot. I was not a marksman, in fact the guy next to me was shooting my target and I was disqualified from getting top honors. All of that said, my groupings today are tighter than my fist so that is to say that unless you are in the "sniper MOS" most of the marksman qualifications provided by the services are really not what everyone thinks they are as it is a highly controlled, static environment. Had Oswald actually been a Marine Sniper, we would be having a completely different conversation as he was in fact a radar operator.
Let's just assume for a minute that Oswald was indeed a crack shot. The four rifles used, which in recent years has been identified by the actual gunsmith hired by the CIA to modify the rifles , was the Italian made 7.35 Mannlicher. In fact, Mr. Robert Morrow has since come forward and stated he was a contractor working for the CIA at the time and that he recognized the modified rifle when it was held up by the FBI as evidence.
Now this is important: MORROW CLAIMS IN HIS BOOK THAT HE CUSTOMISED THE RIFLES SO THAT THEY COULD BE DISMANTLED, HIDDEN AND REASSEMBLED QUICKLY. HE ALSO CLAIMS THAT HE SUPPLIED CIA OPERATIVE DAVID FERRIE WITH FOUR RADIO TRANSCEIVERS THAT WERE NOT DETECTABLE AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT NOT THEN AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET.
This is where is gets interesting because according to the experts, this rifle takes anywhere from 8 to 12 seconds to shoot and reload, plus the time it takes to get back on target - which was moving and 88 yards away. The three shots, according to the Warren Commission, were all completed within 5.6 seconds. So according to their single lone gunman theory Oswald was able to outperform the rifles specifications as those three shots should have taken anywhere from 24-36 seconds to perform in total. You may also note that Morrow did not say anything about trigger modification, etc. Other than the guns ability to be broken down and concealed, no other aspect of the rifles were modified.
This brings us to the eye-witness accounts of shots (along with flashes and smoke) coming from the grassy knoll because no matter how you slice it, sound echoes from one direction do not produce flashes and smoke in another. Witnesses stated there were multiple shots coming from the area of the grassy knoll and that they witnessed several men standing in that location just before the assassination.
So if the simple facts around the performance of said gun aren't compelling enough, let's talk witnesses:
Did you know there were over 100+ witnesses who all met very suspicious and untimely deaths? I will spare you the details for all of them, but let us look at 25 together.